Original scientific article
Downloaded 1719 times
Page 119 - 144
On the cognitive status of mental spaces and of some types of metonymy within Conceptual Integration Theory
E-mail: branimir.belaj@os.t-com.hr
Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Osijeku
Jezikoslovlje_1_.06.2.119.Belaj.pdf [ 0.29 MB - English]
Download article
Abstract: In the light of the automatic nature of the process of conceptual integration we examine
the cognitive-conceptual status of the four types of mental spaces and their
elements: the input spaces, the generic space and the blend. On the basis of the
differences obtaining between the four types of mental spaces we divide them into
defocused, highlighted and focal mental spaces. We further discuss the place and
manner of intepretation of two basic types of metonymy in the context of blending
theory and propose the introduction of a fifth mental space where such metonymies
would be interpreted, namely the pre-input spaces in the case of nonmetaphoric
counterfactuals, or the pre-target space when metonymy operates
within a metaphoric utterance.
Keywords:
Article data in other languages:
Croatian